Are influenza surveillance data useful for mapping presentations?
Identifieur interne : 000535 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 000534; suivant : 000536Are influenza surveillance data useful for mapping presentations?
Auteurs : H. Uphoff [Allemagne] ; I. Stalleicken ; A. Bartelds ; B. Phiesel ; B T KistemannSource :
- Virus research [ 0168-1702 ] ; 2004.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- Allemagne (épidémiologie), Grippe humaine (épidémiologie), Humains (MeSH), Incidence (MeSH), Interprétation statistique de données (MeSH), Notification des maladies (MeSH), Pays-Bas (épidémiologie), Soins de santé primaires (statistiques et données numériques), Surveillance sentinelle (MeSH), Systèmes d'information géographique (statistiques et données numériques).
- MESH :
- statistiques et données numériques : Soins de santé primaires, Systèmes d'information géographique.
- épidémiologie : Allemagne, Grippe humaine, Pays-Bas.
- Humains, Incidence, Interprétation statistique de données, Notification des maladies, Surveillance sentinelle.
- Wicri :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- Data Interpretation, Statistical (MeSH), Disease Notification (MeSH), Geographic Information Systems (statistics & numerical data), Germany (epidemiology), Humans (MeSH), Incidence (MeSH), Influenza, Human (epidemiology), Netherlands (epidemiology), Primary Health Care (statistics & numerical data), Sentinel Surveillance (MeSH).
- MESH :
- geographic , epidemiology : Germany, Netherlands.
- epidemiology : Influenza, Human.
- statistics & numerical data : Geographic Information Systems, Primary Health Care.
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Disease Notification, Humans, Incidence, Sentinel Surveillance.
Abstract
Geographical information system (GIS) based on mappings of influenza data are rare (http://www.b3e.jussieu.fr.80/sentiweb/fr) and influenza data are commonly aggregated for rather large areas (http://www.eiss.org, http://oms2b3e.jussieu.fr/FluNet). The most limiting factors for the use of morbidity-data from practices in GIS-based mappings are differences which are not related to morbidity. These differences may be due to consultation behaviour, interpretation of the case definition, age distribution of patients and other reasons. In order to reduce the impact of these non-morbidity related differences on the interpretation, the data of many practices are usually pooled and consequently rather large areas are presented. Extracting and harmonising the signals for increased morbidity from practices is a presupposition for mapping with a sufficient geographical resolution. The possibility to harmonise by reducing those confounding differences on a practice level is investigated. Different harmonisation methods were applied to data from Germany where acute respiratory infections (ARI) per consultations are registered and from The Netherlands were influenza like illnesses (ILI) per population are registered. The harmonisation of the indices between countries was achieved by scaling them in relation to the level of the index representative for the peak activity during a usual influenza epidemic. The Kriging method is applied as a means of spatial prediction for the influenza data. The preliminary results are discussed with respect to resulting mappings.
DOI: 10.1016/j.virusres.2004.02.010
PubMed: 15163486
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Are influenza surveillance data useful for mapping presentations?</title><author><name sortKey="Uphoff, H" sort="Uphoff, H" uniqKey="Uphoff H" first="H" last="Uphoff">H. Uphoff</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>AGI, Deutsches Grünes Kreuz, Schuhmarkt 4, 35037 Marburg, Germany. helmut.uphoff@kilian.de</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>AGI, Deutsches Grünes Kreuz, Schuhmarkt 4, 35037 Marburg</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Hesse (Land)</region><region type="district" nuts="2">District de Giessen</region><settlement type="city">Marbourg</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stalleicken, I" sort="Stalleicken, I" uniqKey="Stalleicken I" first="I" last="Stalleicken">I. Stalleicken</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bartelds, A" sort="Bartelds, A" uniqKey="Bartelds A" first="A" last="Bartelds">A. Bartelds</name></author><author><name sortKey="Phiesel, B" sort="Phiesel, B" uniqKey="Phiesel B" first="B" last="Phiesel">B. Phiesel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kistemann, B T" sort="Kistemann, B T" uniqKey="Kistemann B" first="B T" last="Kistemann">B T Kistemann</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2004">2004</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:15163486</idno><idno type="pmid">15163486</idno><idno type="doi">10.1016/j.virusres.2004.02.010</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">000534</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">000534</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">000534</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">000534</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">000534</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Are influenza surveillance data useful for mapping presentations?</title><author><name sortKey="Uphoff, H" sort="Uphoff, H" uniqKey="Uphoff H" first="H" last="Uphoff">H. Uphoff</name><affiliation wicri:level="3"><nlm:affiliation>AGI, Deutsches Grünes Kreuz, Schuhmarkt 4, 35037 Marburg, Germany. helmut.uphoff@kilian.de</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">Allemagne</country><wicri:regionArea>AGI, Deutsches Grünes Kreuz, Schuhmarkt 4, 35037 Marburg</wicri:regionArea><placeName><region type="land" nuts="1">Hesse (Land)</region><region type="district" nuts="2">District de Giessen</region><settlement type="city">Marbourg</settlement></placeName></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Stalleicken, I" sort="Stalleicken, I" uniqKey="Stalleicken I" first="I" last="Stalleicken">I. Stalleicken</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bartelds, A" sort="Bartelds, A" uniqKey="Bartelds A" first="A" last="Bartelds">A. Bartelds</name></author><author><name sortKey="Phiesel, B" sort="Phiesel, B" uniqKey="Phiesel B" first="B" last="Phiesel">B. Phiesel</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kistemann, B T" sort="Kistemann, B T" uniqKey="Kistemann B" first="B T" last="Kistemann">B T Kistemann</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">Virus research</title><idno type="ISSN">0168-1702</idno><imprint><date when="2004" type="published">2004</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>Data Interpretation, Statistical (MeSH)</term><term>Disease Notification (MeSH)</term><term>Geographic Information Systems (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Germany (epidemiology)</term><term>Humans (MeSH)</term><term>Incidence (MeSH)</term><term>Influenza, Human (epidemiology)</term><term>Netherlands (epidemiology)</term><term>Primary Health Care (statistics & numerical data)</term><term>Sentinel Surveillance (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>Allemagne (épidémiologie)</term><term>Grippe humaine (épidémiologie)</term><term>Humains (MeSH)</term><term>Incidence (MeSH)</term><term>Interprétation statistique de données (MeSH)</term><term>Notification des maladies (MeSH)</term><term>Pays-Bas (épidémiologie)</term><term>Soins de santé primaires (statistiques et données numériques)</term><term>Surveillance sentinelle (MeSH)</term><term>Systèmes d'information géographique (statistiques et données numériques)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="geographic" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Germany</term><term>Netherlands</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="epidemiology" xml:lang="en"><term>Influenza, Human</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistics & numerical data" xml:lang="en"><term>Geographic Information Systems</term><term>Primary Health Care</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="statistiques et données numériques" xml:lang="fr"><term>Soins de santé primaires</term><term>Systèmes d'information géographique</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="épidémiologie" xml:lang="fr"><term>Allemagne</term><term>Grippe humaine</term><term>Pays-Bas</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Data Interpretation, Statistical</term><term>Disease Notification</term><term>Humans</term><term>Incidence</term><term>Sentinel Surveillance</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Humains</term><term>Incidence</term><term>Interprétation statistique de données</term><term>Notification des maladies</term><term>Surveillance sentinelle</term></keywords><keywords scheme="Wicri" type="geographic" xml:lang="fr"><term>Allemagne</term><term>Pays-Bas</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en">Geographical information system (GIS) based on mappings of influenza data are rare (http://www.b3e.jussieu.fr.80/sentiweb/fr) and influenza data are commonly aggregated for rather large areas (http://www.eiss.org, http://oms2b3e.jussieu.fr/FluNet). The most limiting factors for the use of morbidity-data from practices in GIS-based mappings are differences which are not related to morbidity. These differences may be due to consultation behaviour, interpretation of the case definition, age distribution of patients and other reasons. In order to reduce the impact of these non-morbidity related differences on the interpretation, the data of many practices are usually pooled and consequently rather large areas are presented. Extracting and harmonising the signals for increased morbidity from practices is a presupposition for mapping with a sufficient geographical resolution. The possibility to harmonise by reducing those confounding differences on a practice level is investigated. Different harmonisation methods were applied to data from Germany where acute respiratory infections (ARI) per consultations are registered and from The Netherlands were influenza like illnesses (ILI) per population are registered. The harmonisation of the indices between countries was achieved by scaling them in relation to the level of the index representative for the peak activity during a usual influenza epidemic. The Kriging method is applied as a means of spatial prediction for the influenza data. The preliminary results are discussed with respect to resulting mappings.</div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">15163486</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2004</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>23</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2019</Year><Month>12</Month><Day>10</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Print">0168-1702</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Print"><Volume>103</Volume><Issue>1-2</Issue><PubDate><Year>2004</Year><Month>Jul</Month></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>Virus research</Title><ISOAbbreviation>Virus Res.</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Are influenza surveillance data useful for mapping presentations?</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>35-46</MedlinePgn></Pagination><Abstract><AbstractText>Geographical information system (GIS) based on mappings of influenza data are rare (http://www.b3e.jussieu.fr.80/sentiweb/fr) and influenza data are commonly aggregated for rather large areas (http://www.eiss.org, http://oms2b3e.jussieu.fr/FluNet). The most limiting factors for the use of morbidity-data from practices in GIS-based mappings are differences which are not related to morbidity. These differences may be due to consultation behaviour, interpretation of the case definition, age distribution of patients and other reasons. In order to reduce the impact of these non-morbidity related differences on the interpretation, the data of many practices are usually pooled and consequently rather large areas are presented. Extracting and harmonising the signals for increased morbidity from practices is a presupposition for mapping with a sufficient geographical resolution. The possibility to harmonise by reducing those confounding differences on a practice level is investigated. Different harmonisation methods were applied to data from Germany where acute respiratory infections (ARI) per consultations are registered and from The Netherlands were influenza like illnesses (ILI) per population are registered. The harmonisation of the indices between countries was achieved by scaling them in relation to the level of the index representative for the peak activity during a usual influenza epidemic. The Kriging method is applied as a means of spatial prediction for the influenza data. The preliminary results are discussed with respect to resulting mappings.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Uphoff</LastName><ForeName>H</ForeName><Initials>H</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>AGI, Deutsches Grünes Kreuz, Schuhmarkt 4, 35037 Marburg, Germany. helmut.uphoff@kilian.de</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Stalleicken</LastName><ForeName>I</ForeName><Initials>I</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Bartelds</LastName><ForeName>A</ForeName><Initials>A</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Phiesel</LastName><ForeName>B</ForeName><Initials>B</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Kistemann</LastName><ForeName>B T</ForeName><Initials>BT</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D023362">Evaluation Study</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>Netherlands</Country><MedlineTA>Virus Res</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>8410979</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>0168-1702</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003627" MajorTopicYN="N">Data Interpretation, Statistical</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018563" MajorTopicYN="N">Disease Notification</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D040362" MajorTopicYN="Y">Geographic Information Systems</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005858" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Germany</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="N">epidemiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D006801" MajorTopicYN="N">Humans</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D015994" MajorTopicYN="N">Incidence</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D007251" MajorTopicYN="N">Influenza, Human</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="Y">epidemiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D009426" MajorTopicYN="N" Type="Geographic">Netherlands</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000453" MajorTopicYN="N">epidemiology</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011320" MajorTopicYN="N">Primary Health Care</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000706" MajorTopicYN="N">statistics & numerical data</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018571" MajorTopicYN="Y">Sentinel Surveillance</DescriptorName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2004</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2004</Year><Month>9</Month><Day>24</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2004</Year><Month>5</Month><Day>28</Day><Hour>5</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15163486</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1016/j.virusres.2004.02.010</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">S0168170204001091</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>Allemagne</li></country><region><li>District de Giessen</li><li>Hesse (Land)</li></region><settlement><li>Marbourg</li></settlement></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Bartelds, A" sort="Bartelds, A" uniqKey="Bartelds A" first="A" last="Bartelds">A. Bartelds</name><name sortKey="Kistemann, B T" sort="Kistemann, B T" uniqKey="Kistemann B" first="B T" last="Kistemann">B T Kistemann</name><name sortKey="Phiesel, B" sort="Phiesel, B" uniqKey="Phiesel B" first="B" last="Phiesel">B. Phiesel</name><name sortKey="Stalleicken, I" sort="Stalleicken, I" uniqKey="Stalleicken I" first="I" last="Stalleicken">I. Stalleicken</name></noCountry><country name="Allemagne"><region name="Hesse (Land)"><name sortKey="Uphoff, H" sort="Uphoff, H" uniqKey="Uphoff H" first="H" last="Uphoff">H. Uphoff</name></region></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Sante/explor/GrippeAllemagneV4/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000535 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 000535 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Sante
|area= GrippeAllemagneV4
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:15163486
|texte= Are influenza surveillance data useful for mapping presentations?
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:15163486" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a GrippeAllemagneV4
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.35. |  |